[troods]

I've been very happy with MP3 fiesta and find that the catalogue doesn't not differ from Sparks. In fact, just downloaded Tom Waits' "Orphans" for $2.80 on fiesta at 320 kbps and on Sparks it's $8.38 for 192 kbps.

Fiesta also has a better jazz catalogue with way more Sarah Vaughan than sparks. Between fiesta and lavamus, I'm a very satsified customer.

Troods

[Damo]

Originally Posted by troods

In fact, just downloaded Tom Waits' "Orphans" for $2.80 on fiesta at 320 kbps and on Sparks it's $8.38 for 192 kbps.

Troods

Thought this sounded high for sparks but saw the album is 56 tracks and nearly 190 minutes, sparks charge based on file size, whereas others charge either by album or tracks. But you're right, on this occasion fiesta is a lot cheaper.

A lot of people are members of more than one site and spread their money arround to offset a loss by a site shutdown or, to make the best of many sites

[Frunze]

Originally Posted by troods

I've been very happy with MP3 fiesta and find that the catalogue doesn't not differ from Sparks. In fact, just downloaded Tom Waits' "Orphans" for $2.80 on fiesta at 320 kbps and on Sparks it's $8.38 for 192 kbps.

Fiesta also has a better jazz catalogue with way more Sarah Vaughan than sparks. Between fiesta and lavamus, I'm a very satsified customer.

Troods

Is it pretty good? Orphans, I mean?