I tried it out using a simple image file,and it did work.
I did notice that the sent file could only be "picked up" once.
Then you would have to re-send it to someone else.
This almost performs as a VPN,but with someone in the middle retrieving,and possibly viewing,your files.
It could be a good thing,depending on who(the web host)is actually offering this service,and why are they offering this service?
If sending several audio files,they will certainly be using large amounts of bandwidth,which brings me to question again,why are they doing this for free?
They claim advertisement????
It may be just me being overly cautious,but I always get an eerie feeling with things like this,especially when it's still beta.
With a VPN,it is your ISP's bandwidth being used(you are the server during upload)when you send directly to the recipient(their ISP's bandwidth during download).
It isn't being stored on someone elses server waiting for retrieval,after entering the code,where they then use their bandwidth also to send it to the recipient.
A FAQ quote from PipeBytes;
Quote:
Q: What about privacy?
A: We take your privacy very seriously. We do not store your files. They are sent directly to your peer.
|
This can't be true.
I uploaded an image file.Saved the pickup code.Rebooted with a different machine.Used the pickup code to download the file on the different machine.
If it wasn't stored on their server,how did I get it?
Another quote;
Quote:
Q: I am transferring some very sensitive information, how can I ensure it is not exposed during the transfer?
A: While we promise to guard confidentiality of your information, it might be exposed to other parties, like your and your recipient ISPs.
|
If it is stored on their sever,as it must be as in the above example,they have access to it also.
A great way to send that overly large .zip file that most email clients put a file size limit on,like lots of pictures from that vacation you took.
I'll probally use this myself.

But as for sending audio files,lots of them,I would be cautious.
I would be interested in hearing about anyone else experience with PipeBytes.