Quote:
Originally Posted by 320kbps
Nightfly I apologize, It was NOT my intent to be condescending.My assumption is that you are a very competent audiophile.So I read the article again a little slower and now realize if a person was using itunes and clicked on some itunes + tracks when they were $1.29 U.S. they would find they been charged more.But wouldn't the + track state $1.29 next to where you click to add song.I just checked yes it does. on the other hand if a person knowingly purchased $1.29 + tracks and later found them at .99 that would be disappointing.especially if that person bought a lot of them.If a person was willing to purchase them at $1.29 which I would NOT,and now there .99 be happy there less now at a higher quality and no DRM.  SUPPLY AND DEMAND. no DRM tracks are becoming more of a commodity, thank God for competition in the marketplace.maybe one day .50 
|
Thank you 320kps !
I was speaking on behalf of our fellow members not myself.
But I am glad you re-read the article because I think initially
you may have missed some of the main points.But after your post
I see, after your own re-read you have gotten the point
of Mr.Resnikoff's fine unbiased article. His site leans toward
the corporate side of music things, but I think he had a fair
analysis of the Itunes situation.
And 50 cents is a fairer price that I might someday even consider
going there..For me it's not about the money but my distrust
of their general business practices.....so far.
Amazon is a Corporate sight that I am possibly interested in going to,
because I have had pleasant business dealings with them in the past and hope they continue to develop and open the doors to our global community here.
Remember there is more that you and I agree upon than
disagree upon.It was great having this open discussion
about a important issue that concerns us all.
Take care and thanks again,
