Allofmp3 Community Forums

Welcome to the Allofmp3 Community Forums forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Go Back   Allofmp3 Community Forums > Music Services > Music Industy News
Reload this Page 'Three Strikes' set to go ahead in France
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  (#1 (permalink)) Old
gluteus maximus (Offline)
Senior Member
 
gluteus maximus's Avatar
 
Posts: 917
Thanks: 69
Thanked 81 Times in 56 Posts
Join Date: Jul 2007
'Three Strikes' set to go ahead in France - 11-02-2008, 06:01 PM

From euobserver

Quote:
The French Senate has overwhelmingly voted in favour of a law that would cut off access to the internet to web surfers who repeatedly download copyrighted music, films or video games without paying.

Under the so-called three strikes or "graduated response" legislation - which still needs approval by the lower house before it becomes French law - illegal downloaders are first sent an email warning them of their infraction. They are subsequently sent a warning letter in the post.

If after this second warning they continue to illegally download copyrighted content, the internet service provider will cut off access to the internet for a year.

The legislation passed with a massive cross-party majority of 297 votes to 15. Only a handful of conservatives, centrists and socialists voted against, while the Communists abstained.
Read more here: http://euobserver.com/9/27026
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to gluteus maximus For This Useful Post:
GHERDEZ (11-13-2008)
  (#2 (permalink)) Old
johnnydoen (Offline)
Member
 
Posts: 84
Thanks: 6
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Join Date: Oct 2008
11-02-2008, 07:18 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by gluteus maximus View Post
From euobserver



Read more here: EUobserver
Wasn't this shot down massively by the European Union just a few weeks ago?
Reply With Quote
  (#3 (permalink)) Old
johnnydoen (Offline)
Member
 
Posts: 84
Thanks: 6
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Join Date: Oct 2008
11-02-2008, 07:24 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnydoen View Post
Wasn't this shot down massively by the European Union just a few weeks ago?
It says so in the end of the article also.

Sometimes the French arrogance is so hard to understand for the rest of us Europeans.
Reply With Quote
  (#4 (permalink)) Old
gluteus maximus (Offline)
Senior Member
 
gluteus maximus's Avatar
 
Posts: 917
Thanks: 69
Thanked 81 Times in 56 Posts
Join Date: Jul 2007
11-02-2008, 07:39 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnydoen View Post
Wasn't this shot down massively by the European Union just a few weeks ago?

Just out of interest, what happens in the US when State laws conflict with Federal laws?

gm
Reply With Quote
  (#5 (permalink)) Old
tomhr (Offline)
Senior Member
 
tomhr's Avatar
 
Posts: 123
Thanks: 15
Thanked 17 Times in 10 Posts
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Houston, Texas area
11-03-2008, 09:50 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by gluteus maximus View Post
Just out of interest, what happens in the US when State laws conflict with Federal laws?

gm
It depends.

If the law concerns a federal-government power specifically stated under the US Constitution, then the state law is overpowered by the federal law. (For instance, since the Constitution gives the federal government the powers of interstate commerce, in the 1970s Congress could set a speed limit of 55 mph for interstate highways.) On the other hand, under the Tenth Amendment to the Consitution, the federal government cannot make laws overriding state laws in areas not granted to the federal government in the 1789 Constitution. (Thus for example, Congress cannot simply pass a law banning same-sex marriage; the states' sovereignty regarding marriage law must be respected. The only constitutional way to ban same-sex marriage throughout the USA would be with a Constitutional marriage.)
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to tomhr For This Useful Post:
GHERDEZ (11-13-2008), gluteus maximus (11-03-2008)
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump




vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
Aom3